From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: 2015-01-29 07:24:21
From: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 06:06:36 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
TIME_WAIT sockets are not owning any skb.
ip_send_unicast_reply() and tcp_v6_send_response() both use
regular sockets.
We can safely remove a test in sch_fq and save one cache line miss,
as sk_state is far away from sk_pacing_rate.
Tested at Google for about one year.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>