Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] r8152: check the status before submittingrx
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2014-12-22 05:22:59
Also in:
lkml
From: Hayes Wang <redacted> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 02:53:42 +0000
David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net]quoted
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2014 4:44 AM[...]quoted
quoted
Don't submit the rx if the device is unplugged, linking down, or stopped....quoted
@@ -1789,6 +1789,11 @@ int r8152_submit_rx(struct r8152*tp, struct rx_agg *agg, gfp_t mem_flags)quoted
{ int ret; + /* The rx would be stopped, so skip submitting */ + if (test_bit(RTL8152_UNPLUG, &tp->flags) || + !test_bit(WORK_ENABLE, &tp->flags) || !(tp->speed & LINK_STATUS)) + return 0; +I think netif_carrier_off() should always be true in all three of those situations, and would be a much simpler test than what you've coded here.When the device is unplugged or stopped, the linking status may be true, so I add additional checks to avoid the submission. Besides, in set_carrier() I set netif_carrier_on() after ops.enable() to avoid any transmission before I finish starting the tx/rx. tp->rtl_ops.enable(tp); set_bit(RTL8152_SET_RX_MODE, &tp->flags); netif_carrier_on(netdev); However, the r8152_submit_rx() would be called in ops.enable(), and the check of netif_carrier_ok() would be always false. That is why I use tp->speed, not netif_carrier_ok(), to check the linking stauts.
I stil think your check is way too complicated for this fast path so I would ask that you arrange things such that the simpler netif_carrier_off() test works. Especially because that is what the core networking stack uses to decide whether to send packets to us as well.