On Tue, Dec 16, 2014, at 22:47, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 16:19 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
quoted
Hi Eric,
While fuzzing with trinity on a -next kernel with the undefined behaviour
sanitizer path, I've observed the following warning in code which was
introduced in 04ca6973f7 ("ip: make IP identifiers less predictable"):
This is a false positive.
Also we compile the whole kernel with -fno-strict-overflow, so every
report of signed overflow leading to undefined behavior is probably a
false positive. I don't know if it is worth to try to get rid of them, I
doubt it.
Bye,
Hannes