Re: [PATCH 3/6] bridge: modify IFLA_AF_SPEC parser to parse IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_RANGE_INFO
From: roopa <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-29 23:19:59
On 12/29/14, 2:04 PM, Scott Feldman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:05 PM, [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Roopa Prabhu <redacted> This patch modifies br_afspec to parse incoming IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_RANGE_INFO Signed-off-by: Wilson kok <redacted> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <redacted> --- net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c index e7d1fc0..4c47ba0 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c@@ -227,48 +227,76 @@ static const struct nla_policy ifla_br_policy[IFLA_MAX+1] = { .len = sizeof(struct bridge_vlan_range_info), }, }; +static int br_afspec_vlan_add(struct net_bridge *br, + struct net_bridge_port *p, + u16 vid, u16 flags) +{ + int err = 0; + + if (p) { + err = nbp_vlan_add(p, vid, flags); + if (err) + return err; + + if (flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_MASTER) + err = br_vlan_add(p->br, vid, flags); + } else { + err = br_vlan_add(br, vid, flags); + } + + return err; +} + +static void br_afspec_vlan_del(struct net_bridge *br, + struct net_bridge_port *p, + u16 vid, u16 flags) +{ + if (p) { + nbp_vlan_delete(p, vid); + if (flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_MASTER) + br_vlan_delete(p->br, vid); + } else { + br_vlan_delete(br, vid); + } +} + static int br_afspec(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p, struct nlattr *af_spec, int cmd) { - struct bridge_vlan_info *vinfo; - int err = 0; + struct bridge_vlan_range_info *vinfo; struct nlattr *attr; int err = 0; int rem; u16 vid; nla_for_each_nested(attr, af_spec, rem) { - if (nla_type(attr) != IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO) + if (nla_type(attr) != IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO && + nla_type(attr) != IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_RANGE_INFO) continue; - vinfo = nla_data(attr);Check attr size.quoted
- if (!vinfo->vid || vinfo->vid >= VLAN_VID_MASK) + + if (nla_type(attr) == IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO) + vinfo->vid_end = vinfo->vid;Maybe a switch(nla_type(attr)) would be better to explicitly handle each case? Then the size check can be done for each case, as well as this fix-up for vid_end.
sure, i can do that.
quoted
+ + if (!vinfo->vid || vinfo->vid >= VLAN_VID_MASK || + vinfo->vid_end >= VLAN_VID_MASK || + vinfo->vid > vinfo->vid_end) return -EINVAL; switch (cmd) { case RTM_SETLINK: - if (p) { - err = nbp_vlan_add(p, vinfo->vid, vinfo->flags); + for (vid = vinfo->vid; vid <= vinfo->vid_end; vid++) { + err = br_afspec_vlan_add(br, p, vid, + vinfo->flags); if (err)Do you want to unwind on failure? Seems it should be an all-or-nothing operation.
I could, but looking at other link operations, I don't seen anybody unwinding. An AF_UNSPEC link netlink request can contain multiple link attributes and not all maybe applied AFAICS. But i don't have a strong opinion here. I can unwind if needed.
quoted
break; - - if (vinfo->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_MASTER) - err = br_vlan_add(p->br, vinfo->vid, - vinfo->flags); - } else - err = br_vlan_add(br, vinfo->vid, vinfo->flags); - + } break; - case RTM_DELLINK: - if (p) { - nbp_vlan_delete(p, vinfo->vid); - if (vinfo->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_MASTER) - br_vlan_delete(p->br, vinfo->vid); - } else - br_vlan_delete(br, vinfo->vid); + for (vid = vinfo->vid; vid <= vinfo->vid_end; vid++) + br_afspec_vlan_del(br, p, vid, vinfo->flags); break; } } -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html