Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 7 authors, 2014-12-03

RE: [PATCH net] gso: do GSO for local skb with size bigger than MTU

From: Du, Fan <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-03 06:55:57

-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 1:15 PM
To: Du, Fan
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; fw@strlen.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] gso: do GSO for local skb with size bigger than MTU

From: "Du, Fan" <redacted>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 04:50:21 +0000
quoted
Do you have any better idea to achieve what you said besides this
patch approach without both fragmentation and ICMP message at the same
time to cater for all kinds tunnel tech?
I am not obligated to figure out for you how to design a correctly implemented
patch.

But I am obligated to keep a bad change from going into the tree and that is what I
am doing.
"bad" is not depending whether you say it or not, but what the real world needs and what
proper solution could be provided at the time being.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help