RE: [PATCH net] gso: do GSO for local skb with size bigger than MTU
From: Du, Fan <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-03 06:55:57
From: Du, Fan <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-03 06:55:57
-----Original Message----- From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 1:15 PM To: Du, Fan Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; fw@strlen.de Subject: Re: [PATCH net] gso: do GSO for local skb with size bigger than MTU From: "Du, Fan" <redacted> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 04:50:21 +0000quoted
Do you have any better idea to achieve what you said besides this patch approach without both fragmentation and ICMP message at the same time to cater for all kinds tunnel tech?I am not obligated to figure out for you how to design a correctly implemented patch. But I am obligated to keep a bad change from going into the tree and that is what I am doing.
"bad" is not depending whether you say it or not, but what the real world needs and what proper solution could be provided at the time being.