Re: [PATCH v3] can: Convert to runtime_pm
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2014-11-27 22:56:03
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-can, linux-devicetree, lkml
On 11/27/2014 11:47 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 10:17PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:quoted
On 11/27/2014 02:08 PM, Kedareswara rao Appana wrote:quoted
Instead of enabling/disabling clocks at several locations in the driver, use the runtime_pm framework. This consolidates the actions for runtime PM in the appropriate callbacks and makes the driver more readable and mantainable. Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <redacted> Signed-off-by: Kedareswara rao Appana <redacted> --- Changes for v3: - Converted the driver to use runtime_pm. Changes for v2: - Removed the struct platform_device* from suspend/resume as suggest by Lothar. drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c index 8a998e3..1be28ed 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c[...]quoted
quoted
@@ -1030,7 +1046,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused xcan_resume(struct device *dev) return 0; } -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(xcan_dev_pm_ops, xcan_suspend, xcan_resume); +static const struct dev_pm_ops xcan_dev_pm_ops = { + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(xcan_suspend, xcan_resume) + SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(xcan_runtime_suspend, xcan_runtime_resume, NULL) +}; /** * xcan_probe - Platform registration call@@ -1071,7 +1090,7 @@ static int xcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return -ENOMEM; priv = netdev_priv(ndev); - priv->dev = ndev; + priv->dev = &pdev->dev; priv->can.bittiming_const = &xcan_bittiming_const; priv->can.do_set_mode = xcan_do_set_mode; priv->can.do_get_berr_counter = xcan_get_berr_counter;@@ -1137,6 +1156,11 @@ static int xcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) netif_napi_add(ndev, &priv->napi, xcan_rx_poll, rx_max); + pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev); + pm_runtime_irq_safe(&pdev->dev);You use just clock_enable()/disable() in the runtime functions, thus you can say they are irq_safe. On the other the the zync grpio driver uses "full" prepare_enable/disable_unprepare calls. What's best practice here?IIRC, the prepare/unprepare functions can sleep. xcan_get_berr_counter is called from atomic context. So, I think we have to use the disable/enable functions without the prepare/unprepare. In the GPIO driver the that problem does not exist.
IC, yes, correct. This is why we introducted in other drivers a __get_berr_counter() function, that doesn't touch the clocks, which is used from within the driver (from the atomic contects), while get_berr_counter() will fiddle with the clocks. This function is used for the priv->can.do_get_berr_counter callback. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 819 bytes