On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:05:39 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 02:54:38PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:43:10 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

@@ -174,6 +174,37 @@ enum {

 static inline int vhost_has_feature(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, int bit)
 {
-	return vq->acked_features & (1 << bit);
+	return vq->acked_features & (1ULL << bit);

Should this hunk go into patch 28?

Well, this is needed here since 1 << 32 is not legal C.

I can move it - this means patch 28 will have to move earlier
in series though.

Yes, I think it makes sense to move patch 28 earlier.