RE: [RFC] situation with csum_and_copy_... API
From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-24 10:04:14
Also in:
lkml
From: Al Viro
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 05:42:55PM +0000, David Laight wrote:quoted
Callers of kernel_send/recvmsg() could easily be using a wrapper function that creates the 'msghdr'. When the want to send the remaining part of a buffer the old iterator will no longer be available - just the original iov and the required offset.Er... So why not copy a struct iov_iter to/from msg->msg_iter, then? It's not as it had been particulary large - 5 words isn't much... I'm not at all sure that _anything_ has valid reasons for draining iovecs. Maintaining a struct iov_iter and modifying it is easy and actually faster... Right now the main examples outside of net/* are due to unfortunate limitations of ->sendmsg() - until now it had no way to be told that desired data starts at offset. With ->msg_iter it obviously becomes possible...
It may well be easier for code that only has to run in a new kernel. But for code that has run in old kernels as well you still need to modify the iov[]. This is also true of userspace - there is no way of completing a partial transfer without modifying the iov[] to allow for the partial transfer. Note that I'm not suggesting that any of the 'write' functions should ever modify an iov[]. David