Thread (133 messages) flat view 133 messages, 9 authors, 2015-02-03

RE: [RFC] situation with csum_and_copy_... API

From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-24 10:04:14
Also in: lkml

From: Al Viro
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 05:42:55PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
quoted
Callers of kernel_send/recvmsg() could easily be using a wrapper
function that creates the 'msghdr'.
When the want to send the remaining part of a buffer the old iterator
will no longer be available - just the original iov and the required offset.
Er...  So why not copy a struct iov_iter to/from msg->msg_iter, then?
It's not as it had been particulary large - 5 words isn't much...

I'm not at all sure that _anything_ has valid reasons for draining iovecs.
Maintaining a struct iov_iter and modifying it is easy and actually faster...

Right now the main examples outside of net/* are due to unfortunate
limitations of ->sendmsg() - until now it had no way to be told that
desired data starts at offset.  With ->msg_iter it obviously becomes
possible...
It may well be easier for code that only has to run in a new kernel.
But for code that has run in old kernels as well you still need
to modify the iov[].

This is also true of userspace - there is no way of completing
a partial transfer without modifying the iov[] to allow for the
partial transfer.

Note that I'm not suggesting that any of the 'write' functions
should ever modify an iov[].

	David
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help