On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 16:57 -0500, Pranith Kumar wrote:
Hi Eric,
Thanks for looking at this patch.
I've been scratching my head since morning trying to find out what was
so obviously wrong with this patch. Alas, I don't see what you do.
Could you point it out and show me how incompetent I am, please?
Thanks!
Well, even it the code is _not_ broken, I don't see any value with this
patch.
If I use git blame on current code, line containing
smp_read_barrier_depends() exactly points to the relevant commit [1]
After your change, it will point to some cleanup, which makes little
sense to me, considering you did not change the smp_wmb() in
xt_replace_table().
I, as a netfilter contributor would like to keep current code as is,
because it is how I feel safe with it.
We have a proliferation of interfaces, but this does not help to
understand the issues and code maintenance.
smp_read_barrier_depends() better documents the read barrier than
lockless_dereference().
The point of having a lock or not is irrelevant here.
[1]
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=b416c144f46af1a30ddfa4e4319a8f077381ad63