From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@perches.com]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 1:33 PM
To: Wang, Yalin
Cc: 'chunkeey@googlemail.com'; 'linville@tuxdriver.com'; 'linux-
wireless@vger.kernel.org'; 'netdev@vger.kernel.org'; 'linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org'
Subject: Re: [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8

On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 13:16 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:

quoted

Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.

This allows some architectures with hardware instructions for bit
reversals to eliminate the array.

This one is already in -next

commit 7a1283d8f5298437a454ec477384dcd9f9f88bac
Author: Joe Perches [off-list ref]
Date:   Tue Oct 28 14:18:58 2014 -0700

    carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8

    Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.

    This allows some architectures with hardware instructions
    for bit reversals to eliminate the array.

    Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [off-list ref]
    Signed-off-by: John W. Linville [off-list ref]

Got it ,
So I need wait for your another patch to be accepted.

Thanks!