Re: [net-next 2/2] sctp: replace seq_printf with seq_puts
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: 2014-10-30 10:26:31
Also in:
linux-sctp
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: 2014-10-30 10:26:31
Also in:
linux-sctp
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:29:16AM +0100, Michele Baldessari wrote:
Fixes checkpatch warning: "WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf" Signed-off-by: Michele Baldessari <redacted> --- net/sctp/proc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c index bfb242af06ab..0697eda5aed8 100644 --- a/net/sctp/proc.c +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c@@ -490,14 +490,14 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) * Note: We don't have a way to tally this at the moment * so lets just leave it as zero for the moment */ - seq_printf(seq, "0 "); + seq_puts(seq, "0 "); /* * remote address start time (START). This is also not * currently implemented, but we can record it with a * jiffies marker in a subsequent patch */ - seq_printf(seq, "0 "); + seq_puts(seq, "0 "); /* * The current state of this destination. I.e.-- 2.1.0
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>