Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2014-10-30

Re: [net-next 2/2] sctp: replace seq_printf with seq_puts

From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: 2014-10-30 10:26:31
Also in: linux-sctp

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:29:16AM +0100, Michele Baldessari wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fixes checkpatch warning:
"WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf"

Signed-off-by: Michele Baldessari <redacted>
---
 net/sctp/proc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c
index bfb242af06ab..0697eda5aed8 100644
--- a/net/sctp/proc.c
+++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
@@ -490,14 +490,14 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 			 * Note: We don't have a way to tally this at the moment
 			 * so lets just leave it as zero for the moment
 			 */
-			seq_printf(seq, "0 ");
+			seq_puts(seq, "0 ");
 
 			/*
 			 * remote address start time (START).  This is also not
 			 * currently implemented, but we can record it with a
 			 * jiffies marker in a subsequent patch
 			 */
-			seq_printf(seq, "0 ");
+			seq_puts(seq, "0 ");
 
 			/*
 			 * The current state of this destination. I.e.
-- 
2.1.0
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help