Hi Erik,
On Mi, 2014-10-29 at 18:34 +0900, Erik Kline wrote:
Given that we spoke about this reduction in the number of netlink messages
earlier, do you still think it's an issue?
No, it would be nice to have but as this is just a minor detail and
complexity would be too high I am fine with your current solution.
The end result here is that for listeners on netlink sockets on systems
that (a) have optimistic dad built-in, (b) have optimistic dad enabled, and
(c) have use_optimistic set: they'll 2 notifications (with different flags)
for automatically added addresses on these interfaces.
Ack, I see.
(Personally, given that we appear to send an RTM_NEWADDR when the address
gets deprecated (I think), I think sending one on every flag change of
interest is in keeping with existing behaviour.)
It does make sense, I have no objections.
Bye,
Hannes