Re: IPv6 UFO for VMs
From: Ben Hutchings <hidden>
Date: 2014-10-27 03:22:07
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 11:35 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Mi, 2014-10-22 at 00:44 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:quoted
There are several ways that VMs can take advantage of UFO and get the host to do fragmentation for them: drivers/net/macvtap.c: gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP; drivers/net/tun.c: skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP; drivers/net/virtio_net.c: skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP; Our implementation of UFO for IPv6 does: fptr = (struct frag_hdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + unfrag_ip6hlen); fptr->nexthdr = nexthdr; fptr->reserved = 0; fptr->identification = skb_shinfo(skb)->ip6_frag_id; which assumes ip6_frag_id has been set. That's only true if the local stack constructed the skb; otherwise it appears we get zero. This seems to be a regression as a result of: commit 916e4cf46d0204806c062c8c6c4d1f633852c5b6 Author: Hannes Frederic Sowa [off-list ref] Date: Fri Feb 21 02:55:35 2014 +0100 ipv6: reuse ip6_frag_id from ip6_ufo_append_data However, that change seems reasonable - we *shouldn't* be choosing IDs for any other stack. Any paravirt net driver that can use IPv6 UFO needs to have some way of passing a fragmentation ID to put in skb_shared_info::ip6_frag_id.Do we really gain a lot of performance by enabling UFO on those devices or would it make sense to just drop support? It only helps fragmenting large UDP packets, so I don't think it is worth it.
It's not been important enough for anyone to bother implementing it in hardware/firmware aside from Neterion. I'll shortly post patches to disable it. Ben.
Otherwise I agree with Ben, we need to pass a fragmentation id from the host over to the system segmenting the gso frame. Fragmentation ids must be generated by the end system. Hmm...
--
Ben Hutchings
Theory and practice are closer in theory than in practice.
- John Levine, moderator of comp.compilers Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 811 bytes