Thread (19 messages) flat view 19 messages, 2 authors, 2014-09-16

Re: [PATCH v12 net-next 03/11] bpf: add lookup/update/delete/iterate methods to BPF maps

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2014-09-16 19:16:12
Also in: linux-api, lkml

From: Alexei Starovoitov <redacted>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:18:33 -0700
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -83,6 +112,15 @@ union bpf_attr {
 		__u32	value_size;	/* size of value in bytes */
 		__u32	max_entries;	/* max number of entries in a map */
 	};
+
+	struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_MAP_*_ELEM commands */
+		int map_fd;
+		void __user *key;
+		union {
+			void __user *value;
+			void __user *next_key;
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 #endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_BPF_H__ */
Depending upon the processor ABI, this change can increase the
alignment requirements of union bpf_attr.  So the structure is not
compatible between patch #1 and patch #3 here.

Also, you haven't implemented any compat layer whatsoever for the
necessary translations.  This happens because you are using pointers
which are different sized between 32-bit and 64-bit ABIs.

I would suggest you use instead something like "aligned_u64" since
these are just arbitrary userland cookies and using "aligned_u64"
vs. "u64" will make it so that you don't have to deal with the 64-bit
type alignment differences between x86-32 and x86-64 while writing the
compat wrappers (if any).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help