Thread (34 messages) 34 messages, 8 authors, 2014-09-05

Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1699)

From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-02 18:15:40
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 11:04 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
quoted
quoted
I definitely don't have a problem cleaning this up in net-next. I wanted
a minimal patch for stable because I didn't check history where and when
additional users of dev_get_by_flags_rcu were removed.
`git grep` should show you we only have one caller. Apparently we don't
care about any out-of-tree module.
Point is : you did not check if some stable versions had more callers.

Its very nice you checked current version, but it is not enough for a
stable candidate.
That is what we do when backporting patches, I can do that if David asks
me to backport it, but you know for netdev that is David's work.

(I am not saying I don't want to help him, I just want to point out the fact.
I am very pleased to help David for stable backports as long as he asks)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help