Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 8 authors, 2014-09-30

Re: VRFs and the scalability of namespaces

From: Sowmini Varadhan <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-29 16:50:42

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Ben Greear [off-list ref] wrote:
On 09/29/2014 06:06 AM, David Ahern wrote:
We have implemented support for at least most of this (excepting duplicate IPs)
using routing tables, rules, and (optionally, xorp as the router).
My undertanding of multiple routing-tables/rules was that they
are closer in semantics to switch/router ACLs than to VRFs, eg.,
one big difference is that an interface can belong to exactly one
VRF at a time, which is not mandated by multiple routing-tables/rules.

Was I mistaken?

--Sowmini
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help