Re: [PATCH 9/11 V2 NEXT] rtlwifi: rtl8188ee: Update driver to match Realtek release of 06282014
From: Larry Finger <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-28 22:40:54
Also in:
linux-wireless
On 09/27/2014 02:49 PM, Francois Romieu wrote:
Larry Finger [off-list ref] : [...]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/core.c index 40738e3..d30f416 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/core.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/core.c@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ #include "cam.h" #include "base.h" #include "ps.h" +#include "pwrseqcmd.h" #include "btcoexist/rtl_btc.h" #include <linux/firmware.h>@@ -1700,3 +1701,100 @@ const struct ieee80211_ops rtl_ops = { }; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtl_ops); +/* Description: + * This routine deals with the Power Configuration CMD + * parsing for RTL8723/RTL8188E Series IC. + * Assumption: + * We should follow specific format that was released from HW SD."released" is a bit misleading if it does not mean "publicly released".quoted
+ */ +bool rtl_hal_pwrseqcmdparsing(struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv, u8 cut_version, + u8 faversion, u8 interface_type, + struct wlan_pwr_cfg pwrcfgcmd[]) +{ + struct wlan_pwr_cfg cfg_cmd = {0}; + bool polling_bit = false; + u32 ary_idx = 0;u32 i;quoted
+ u8 value = 0; + u32 offset = 0;Useless init.quoted
+ u32 polling_count = 0;Wrong scope.quoted
+ u32 max_polling_cnt = 5000;Inverted xmas tree for declaration.
I do not understand what you mean here.
quoted
+ + do {while (1) {quoted
+ cfg_cmd = pwrcfgcmd[ary_idx]; + RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_INIT, DBG_TRACE, + "rtl_hal_pwrseqcmdparsing(): offset(%#x),cut_msk(%#x), famsk(%#x), interface_msk(%#x), base(%#x), cmd(%#x), msk(%#x), value(%#x)\n",^^^ missing spacequoted
+ GET_PWR_CFG_OFFSET(cfg_cmd), + GET_PWR_CFG_CUT_MASK(cfg_cmd), + GET_PWR_CFG_FAB_MASK(cfg_cmd), + GET_PWR_CFG_INTF_MASK(cfg_cmd), + GET_PWR_CFG_BASE(cfg_cmd), GET_PWR_CFG_CMD(cfg_cmd), + GET_PWR_CFG_MASK(cfg_cmd), GET_PWR_CFG_VALUE(cfg_cmd)); + + if ((GET_PWR_CFG_FAB_MASK(cfg_cmd)&faversion) && + (GET_PWR_CFG_CUT_MASK(cfg_cmd)&cut_version) &&^^^ missing spacesquoted
+ (GET_PWR_CFG_INTF_MASK(cfg_cmd)&interface_type)) { + switch (GET_PWR_CFG_CMD(cfg_cmd)) { + case PWR_CMD_READ: + RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_INIT, DBG_TRACE, + "rtl_hal_pwrseqcmdparsing(): PWR_CMD_READ\n");It should line up after the parenthesis.quoted
+ break; + case PWR_CMD_WRITE: + RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_INIT, DBG_TRACE, + "rtl_hal_pwrseqcmdparsing(): PWR_CMD_WRITE\n"); + offset = GET_PWR_CFG_OFFSET(cfg_cmd); + + /*Read the value from system register*/ + value = rtl_read_byte(rtlpriv, offset); + value &= (~(GET_PWR_CFG_MASK(cfg_cmd)));Excess parenthsis.quoted
+ value |= (GET_PWR_CFG_VALUE(cfg_cmd) & + GET_PWR_CFG_MASK(cfg_cmd));Excess parenthsis.quoted
+ + /*Write the value back to sytem register*/ + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, offset, value); + break; + case PWR_CMD_POLLING: + RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_INIT, DBG_TRACE, + "rtl_hal_pwrseqcmdparsing(): PWR_CMD_POLLING\n");It should line up after the parenthesis.quoted
+ polling_bit = false; + offset = GET_PWR_CFG_OFFSET(cfg_cmd); + + do { + value = rtl_read_byte(rtlpriv, offset); + + value &= GET_PWR_CFG_MASK(cfg_cmd); + if (value == + (GET_PWR_CFG_VALUE(cfg_cmd) & + GET_PWR_CFG_MASK(cfg_cmd))) + polling_bit = true; + else + udelay(10); + + if (polling_count++ > max_polling_cnt) + return false; + } while (!polling_bit);Simple "for" loop in disguise. An helper function may help. Imnsho the whole do { more, more, more } while (1) concept is broken. [...]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/def.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/def.h index c764fff..d9ea9d0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/def.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/def.h[...]quoted
@@ -225,44 +218,37 @@ enum power_polocy_config { }; enum interface_select_pci { - INTF_SEL1_MINICARD, - INTF_SEL0_PCIE, - INTF_SEL2_RSV, - INTF_SEL3_RSV, + INTF_SEL1_MINICARD = 0, + INTF_SEL0_PCIE = 1, + INTF_SEL2_RSV = 2, + INTF_SEL3_RSV = 3,Please use tabs to line things up. [...]quoted
+ HAL_FW_C2H_CMD_READ_MACREG = 0, + HAL_FW_C2H_CMD_READ_BBREG = 1, + HAL_FW_C2H_CMD_READ_RFREG = 2, + HAL_FW_C2H_CMD_READ_EEPROM = 3, + HAL_FW_C2H_CMD_READ_EFUSE = 4,See above. [...]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/dm.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/dm.c index f8daa61..2aa34d9 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/dm.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/dm.c[...]quoted
- rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XATXIQIMBAL, MASKDWORD, - value32); + rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XATXIQIMBALANCE, + MASKDWORD, value32);It lacks of consistency, see the *NICE* marker below.quoted
value32 = (ele_c & 0x000003C0) >> 6; - rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XCTXAFE, MASKH4BITS, value32); + rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XCTXAFE, MASKH4BITS, + value32);?quoted
value32 = ((iqk_result_x * ele_d) >> 7) & 0x01; - rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_ECCATHRES, BIT(24), value32); + rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_ECCATHRESHOLD, BIT(24), + value32); break; case RF90_PATH_B: value32 = (ele_d << 22)|((ele_c & 0x3F)<<16) | ele_a; - rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XBTXIQIMBAL, - MASKDWORD, value32); + rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XBTXIQIMBALANCE, MASKDWORD, + value32);*NICE* [...]quoted
@@ -210,16 +209,20 @@ static void rtl88e_set_iqk_matrix(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, } else { switch (rfpath) { case RF90_PATH_A: - rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XATXIQIMBAL, MASKDWORD, - ofdmswing_table[ofdm_index]); - rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XCTXAFE, MASKH4BITS, 0x00); - rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_ECCATHRES, BIT(24), 0x00); + rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XATXIQIMBALANCE, + MASKDWORD, ofdmswing_table[ofdm_index]); + rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XCTXAFE, + MASKH4BITS, 0x00);rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XCTXAFE, MASKH4BITS, 0x00);quoted
+ rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_ECCATHRESHOLD, + BIT(24), 0x00);rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_ECCATHRESHOLD, BIT(24), 0x00);quoted
break; case RF90_PATH_B: - rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XBTXIQIMBAL, MASKDWORD, - ofdmswing_table[ofdm_index]); - rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XDTXAFE, MASKH4BITS, 0x00); - rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_ECCATHRES, BIT(28), 0x00); + rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XBTXIQIMBALANCE, + MASKDWORD, ofdmswing_table[ofdm_index]); + rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XDTXAFE, + MASKH4BITS, 0x00);rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_XDTXAFE, MASKH4BITS, 0x00);quoted
+ rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_ECCATHRESHOLD, + BIT(28), 0x00);rtl_set_bbreg(hw, ROFDM0_ECCATHRESHOLD, BIT(28), 0x00); [...]quoted
@@ -263,46 +266,75 @@ void rtl88e_dm_txpower_track_adjust(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, (pwr_val << 24); } - -static void rtl88e_chk_tx_track(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, - enum pwr_track_control_method method, - u8 rfpath, u8 index) +static void dm_tx_pwr_track_set_pwr(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, + enum pwr_track_control_method method, + u8 rfpath, u8 channel_mapped_index) { struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw); - struct rtl_phy *rtlphy = &(rtlpriv->phy); + struct rtl_phy *rtlphy = &rtlpriv->phy; struct rtl_dm *rtldm = rtl_dm(rtl_priv(hw)); - int jj = rtldm->swing_idx_cck; - int i; if (method == TXAGC) { - if (rtldm->swing_flag_ofdm == true || - rtldm->swing_flag_cck == true) { - u8 chan = rtlphy->current_channel; - rtl88e_phy_set_txpower_level(hw, chan); + if (rtldm->swing_flag_ofdm || + rtldm->swing_flag_cck) {Single line.quoted
+ rtl88e_phy_set_txpower_level(hw, + rtlphy->current_channel); rtldm->swing_flag_ofdm = false; rtldm->swing_flag_cck = false; } } else if (method == BBSWING) { if (!rtldm->cck_inch14) { - for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) - rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa22 + i, - cck_tbl_ch1_13[jj][i]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa22, + cck_tbl_ch1_13[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][0]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa23, + cck_tbl_ch1_13[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][1]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa24, + cck_tbl_ch1_13[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][2]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa25, + cck_tbl_ch1_13[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][3]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa26, + cck_tbl_ch1_13[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][4]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa27, + cck_tbl_ch1_13[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][5]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa28, + cck_tbl_ch1_13[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][6]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa29, + cck_tbl_ch1_13[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][7]);? I hope someone got the "-R" flag of patch wrong.quoted
} else { - for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) - rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa22 + i, - cck_tbl_ch14[jj][i]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa22, + cck_tbl_ch14[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][0]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa23, + cck_tbl_ch14[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][1]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa24, + cck_tbl_ch14[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][2]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa25, + cck_tbl_ch14[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][3]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa26, + cck_tbl_ch14[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][4]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa27, + cck_tbl_ch14[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][5]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa28, + cck_tbl_ch14[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][6]); + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, 0xa29, + cck_tbl_ch14[rtldm->swing_idx_cck][7]);Sic.quoted
} if (rfpath == RF90_PATH_A) { - long x = rtlphy->iqk_matrix[index].value[0][0]; - long y = rtlphy->iqk_matrix[index].value[0][1]; - u8 indx = rtldm->swing_idx_ofdm[rfpath]; - rtl88e_set_iqk_matrix(hw, indx, rfpath, x, y); + rtl88e_set_iqk_matrix(hw, rtldm->swing_idx_ofdm[rfpath], + rfpath, rtlphy->iqk_matrix + [channel_mapped_index]. + value[0][0], + rtlphy->iqk_matrix + [channel_mapped_index]. + value[0][1]); } else if (rfpath == RF90_PATH_B) { - u8 indx = rtldm->swing_idx_ofdm[rfpath]; - long x = rtlphy->iqk_matrix[indx].value[0][4]; - long y = rtlphy->iqk_matrix[indx].value[0][5]; - rtl88e_set_iqk_matrix(hw, indx, rfpath, x, y); + rtl88e_set_iqk_matrix(hw, rtldm->swing_idx_ofdm[rfpath], + rfpath, rtlphy->iqk_matrix + [channel_mapped_index]. + value[0][4], + rtlphy->iqk_matrix + [channel_mapped_index]. + value[0][5]);:o( I stop here. I don't enjoy playing the bad cop and this patch is feeding crap into the kernel.
Thanks for the review. As I explained in V1 of these patches, I am trying to merge the kernel and Realtek internal code repositories in the hope that Realtek will keep the two of them in sync. In addition, I am hoping that they will take over maintaining these codes in the future. If I insist on an absolute minimum of change in the kernel code, then the churn of the Realtek repo is increased, and I run the risk of failing in the process of merging the two repos. In my estimation, that would be a bigger disaster than getting some code into the kernel that is not as pretty as could be. In addition, I am not sure how much longer I want to volunteer full time to support these codes. Larry