Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2014-09-05

Re: [PATCH] rose: use %*ph specifier

From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2014-09-05 15:22:51
Also in: linux-hams

On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 08:17 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 18:01 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
quoted
Instead of dereference each byte let's use %*ph specifier in the printk()
calls.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 net/rose/rose_link.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/rose/rose_link.c b/net/rose/rose_link.c
index bc55142..ce60771 100644
--- a/net/rose/rose_link.c
+++ b/net/rose/rose_link.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ void rose_link_rx_restart(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rose_neigh *neigh, unsigne
 		break;
 
 	case ROSE_DIAGNOSTIC:
-		printk(KERN_WARNING "ROSE: received diagnostic #%d - %02X %02X %02X\n", skb->data[3], skb->data[4], skb->data[5], skb->data[6]);
+		pr_warn("ROSE: received diagnostic #%d - %4ph\n", skb->data + 3);
 		break;
 
 	default:
That can not be correct.
Yes, you right.
Have you even compiled this ?
Apparently not this time.


-- 
Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref]
Intel Finland Oy
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help