Re: [PATCH] rose: use %*ph specifier
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2014-09-05 15:22:51
Also in:
linux-hams
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2014-09-05 15:22:51
Also in:
linux-hams
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 08:17 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 18:01 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:quoted
Instead of dereference each byte let's use %*ph specifier in the printk() calls. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- net/rose/rose_link.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/net/rose/rose_link.c b/net/rose/rose_link.c index bc55142..ce60771 100644 --- a/net/rose/rose_link.c +++ b/net/rose/rose_link.c@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ void rose_link_rx_restart(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rose_neigh *neigh, unsigne break; case ROSE_DIAGNOSTIC: - printk(KERN_WARNING "ROSE: received diagnostic #%d - %02X %02X %02X\n", skb->data[3], skb->data[4], skb->data[5], skb->data[6]); + pr_warn("ROSE: received diagnostic #%d - %4ph\n", skb->data + 3); break; default:That can not be correct.
Yes, you right.
Have you even compiled this ?
Apparently not this time. -- Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] Intel Finland Oy