Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 3 authors, 2014-08-05

Re: [PATCH] drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig: Let HISAX_NETJET skip microblaze architecture

From: Jean Delvare <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-04 19:24:00
Also in: lkml

Hi Chen Gang,

On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 02:24:09 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
For HISAX_NETJET, HISAX_NETJET_U or related config needs !__BIG_ENDIAN,
so skip microblaze, just like skip all other architectures which have
no CONFIG_*_ENDIAN.

The related error (with allmodconfig under microblaze):

    CC [M]  drivers/isdn/hisax/nj_s.o
  drivers/isdn/hisax/nj_s.c: In function 'setup_netjet_s':
  drivers/isdn/hisax/nj_s.c:265:2: error: #error "not running on big endian machines now"
   #error "not running on big endian machines now"
    ^

Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <redacted>
---
 drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig b/drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig
index 97465ac..eb83d94 100644
--- a/drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ config HISAX_MIC
 
 config HISAX_NETJET
 	bool "NETjet card"
-	depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN)))
+	depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || MICROBLAZE))
 	depends on VIRT_TO_BUS
 	help
 	  This enables HiSax support for the NetJet from Traverse
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ config HISAX_NETJET
 
 config HISAX_NETJET_U
 	bool "NETspider U card"
-	depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN)))
+	depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || MICROBLAZE))
 	depends on VIRT_TO_BUS
 	help
 	  This enables HiSax support for the Netspider U interface ISDN card
Fine with me, however the list is getting long. It would be better if
we could depend on a functional symbol rather than a negated list of
architectures. Would it make sense to have CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
defined on all little-endian architectures, so that driver can depend
on that if needed?

Alternatively, it might make more sense to list the architectures where
these drivers are actually used in practice. I guess that's X86, maybe
ARM and IA64, and that's all?

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help