smsc911x_suspend crash (was: Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Add missing call to shmobile_init_late())
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2014-08-14 08:52:32
Also in:
linux-sh
Hi Simon, (taking this to netdev for the crash in smsc911x_suspend()) On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Simon Horman [off-list ref] wrote:
while this may be part of the puzzle my light testing shows that suspend-to-ram does not appear to work with this patch applied.
Thanks for testing!
My procedure is as followw. 1. Apply this patch on top of renesas-devel-v3.16-20140811 2. make bockw_defconfig 3. Select CONFIG_SUSPEND 4. Update r8a7778-bockw.dts to include no_console_suspend in bootargs
Alternative: echo 0 > /sys/module/printk/parameters/console_suspend
4. Boot and then: i. echo enabled > /sys/devices/platform/sh-sci.0/tty/ttySC0/power/wakeup ii. echo mem > /sys/power/wakeup_count
Uh? echo mem > /sys/power/state
root@debian:~# echo mem > /sys/power/wakeup_count -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
I guess there's an "echo mem > /sys/power/state" here?
INIT: Id "2" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: Id "1" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes ate PM: Syncing filesystems ... done. Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.002 seconds) done. Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.002 seconds) done. rtc-rx8581 0-0051: low voltage detected, date/time is not reliable. Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000620 pgd = cfbec000 [00000620] *pgd=6fbd1831, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000 Internal error: Oops: 17 [#1] ARM CPU: 0 PID: 1591 Comm: bash Not tainted 3.16.0-00001-g535da58-dirty #44 task: cfaa54c0 ti: cfaa8000 task.ti: cfaa8000 PC is at smsc911x_suspend+0x18/0x3c LR is at dpm_run_callback.isra.11+0x24/0x50 pc : [<c01d588c>] lr : [<c019c004>] psr: a0000093 sp : cfaa9d98 ip : cfaa9db0 fp : cfaa9dac r10: 00000000 r9 : c03fbe78 r8 : 00000000 r7 : cfa24474 r6 : c0426b7c r5 : c01d5874 r4 : a0000013 r3 : 00000000 r2 : 00000000 r1 : cfa24440 r0 : 00000000
drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c:
static int smsc911x_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct net_device *ndev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
So ndev == NULL, boom!
struct smsc911x_data *pdata = netdev_priv(ndev);
/* enable wake on LAN, energy detection and the external PME
* signal. */
smsc911x_reg_write(pdata, PMT_CTRL,
PMT_CTRL_PM_MODE_D1_ | PMT_CTRL_WOL_EN_ |
PMT_CTRL_ED_EN_ | PMT_CTRL_PME_EN_);
return 0;
}
However, I don't immediately see how this can be NULL.
smsc911x_drv_probe() does call "platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);".
And
struct net_device *ndev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
should be equivalent to
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
struct net_device *ndev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
Another SMSC driver, drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c has an explicit
NULL-check for ndev:
static int smc_drv_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
struct net_device *ndev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
if (ndev) {
struct smc_local *lp = netdev_priv(ndev);
....
}
return 0;
}
But other drivers like igb don't.
Anyone with a clue? Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds