Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2 2/3] xen-netback: don't stop dealloc kthread too early
From: David Vrabel <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-11 14:34:50
On 11/08/14 15:31, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 02:58:13PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:quoted
On 11/08/14 14:48, Wei Liu wrote:quoted
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 01:10:12PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:quoted
On 08/08/14 17:37, Wei Liu wrote:[...]quoted
quoted
if (tx_evtchn == rx_evtchn) { /* feature-split-event-channels == 0 */@@ -687,6 +700,9 @@ void xenvif_disconnect(struct xenvif *vif) queue->task = NULL; } + wait_event(queue->inflight_wq, + atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets) == 0);Just make the dealloc task not stop unless it has deallocated all outstanding requests. There's no need for another wait queue here.Are you suggesting something like while (atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets) !=0) schedule_timeout(SOME_TIMEOUT);No. That would be awful! Add the test to the kthread itself: int xenvif_dealloc_kthread(void *data) { struct xenvif_queue *queue = data; while (atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets) > 0 || !kthread_should_stop()) { [...] etc. Although, the main loop is a bit confused, so I suggest adding: static bool xenvif_dealloc_thread_should_stop(struct xenvif_queue *q) { /* Dealloc thread must remain running if there are any inflight * packets so it can properly dealloc them when they complete. */ return atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets) == 0 && kthread_should_stop(); } And cleaning it up a bit (the while() could be a for(;;)).Unfortunately this approach is bogus. If xenbus thread is not blocked it can free up various resources while dealloc thread is running -- queue can be gone under dealloc thread's feet.
kthread_stop() waits until the thread exits (like pthread_join()). /** * kthread_stop - stop a thread created by kthread_create(). * @k: thread created by kthread_create(). * * Sets kthread_should_stop() for @k to return true, wakes it, and * waits for it to exit. David