RE: Information about SCTP patch
From: Padiyar, Prasad (NSN - IN/Bangalore) <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-23 12:18:43
Also in:
linux-sctp
Hi Michele, Thanks for your time and reply. We here have a requirement to implement a CLI to get these stats. And one of the options we thought to use was /proc files to get these stats. Going through the mail chain of this patch (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sctp/msg01813.html) , I came across this. " socket option is preferable as /proc doesn't scale very well as number of associations grows." Here I am just curious to know how much "is the number of associations" referred to? Thanks & Regards, Prasad -----Original Message----- From: ext Michele Baldessari [mailto:michele@acksyn.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:33 PM To: kishan simha Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Padiyar, Prasad (NSN - IN/Bangalore); Kumar, Sumit 11. (NSN - IN/Bangalore) Subject: Re: Information about SCTP patch Hi Kishan, On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:08:21PM +0530, kishan simha wrote:
We are trying to integrate this patch to a little older kernel 2.6.34.13.
This is trivial as we've done so for RHEL 6.5 already.
Additionally we are planning to give a proc file interface to display the stats. I came across a review comment for your patch, where the proc solution was rejected. Can you provide some information on why the solution was rejected ?
It was preferred to do it via an API extension, similar to how Solaris does it. And, I believe, the /proc interface for these kind of things is discouraged. regards, Michele -- Michele Baldessari [off-list ref] C2A5 9DA3 9961 4FFB E01B D0BC DDD4 DCCB 7515 5C6D