Re: How to replace control code in gdm72xx?
From: Ben Chan <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-17 00:59:15
Also in:
linux-wireless
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Greg KH [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:24:28PM +0100, Michalis Pappas wrote:quoted
Hi, I'm currently working on bringing the gdm72xx WiMAX driver out of staging. The driver currently uses two control channels: 1. The SIOCDEVPRIVATE ioctl to send and receive state messages 2. A customly defined netlink protocol for passing messages verbatim to the device controller AFAIK both of the above are deprecated, so I considered switching to the interface defined in wimax.h, which defines a communication protocol over generic netlink that replaces (2) nicely. However it is not compatible with (1), as: * Except from the device status, the gdm72xx driver uses two more types of messages (connection and OMA status), which is not supported by wimax.h. * The gdm driver needs to be able to receive status messages from userspace, which is not supported by wimax.h either.What type of status messages are needed to be sent to the driver?
From what I read from the user-space code, the custom ioctl is to read
the following information from the driver:
enum {
SIOC_DATA_FSM, // Device/Connection State
SIOC_DATA_NETLIST, // Network list
SIOC_DATA_CONNNSP, // Connected NSP
SIOC_DATA_CONNCOMP, // Connection completion info
SIOC_DATA_PROFILEID, // WiMAX profile ID
SIOC_DATA_END
};
Reference:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/gdmwimax/+/master/sdk/io.c
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/gdmwimax/+/master/sdk/sdk.c
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/gdmwimax/+/master/sdk/wm_ioctl.h
quoted
I therefore consider using the wimax stack as defined in wimax.h for the netlink part, but replacing the ioctl with a file under /sys/class/net/wm0/Is anyone still working on wimax to even object to add new functions like this? :)
The driver has a corresponding user-space library, so I'd like to figure out a way to maintain backward compatibility if possible. But I'm happy to help make minor changes to the user-space library in case we need to modify the ioctl / netlink part of the driver (caveat: I'm not the author of the driver or the user-space library).
thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel