Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2014-07-01

Re: [PATCH] Use dev_port for the ID of a network device.

From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-01 12:25:57

On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:40:57AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
FYI: I just got this back from systemd-devel-owner@lists.freedesktop.org :

 Please subscribe to this mailing list, all non-subscriber emails are
 automatically rejected by the server.
 
 If you actually don't want to receive the mails, stay subscribed but
 just disable the delivery in the mailman web interface. You will still
 be able to send messages that way.
 
 We were unable to cope with the amount of SPAM, and the moderation
 queue was not actually moderated by anybody, so rejection seemed more
 appropriate than no answer and no delivery to the list.
 
 Thanks for understanding.


Please do not crosspost between netdev and closed mailing lists.  It
splits the followup threads between those who are inside the closed
community and those who are not.

I've removed systemd-devel from the CC list of this email.

Thanks for understanding.


Bjørn
Not sure how, but my patch got through, and I don't recall being
subscribed, so I thought it was a an open list. Anyway, it's something
that I considered important to be considered by the two communities.

Kay raises up the matter of still using dev_id. Since we had drivers
that used that in the past, should we use it as a fallback for older
kernels where dev_port is not there?

Regards.
Cascardo.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help