Thread (62 messages) 62 messages, 8 authors, 2014-07-05

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 08/14] bpf: add eBPF verifier

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: 2014-06-29 01:59:13
Also in: linux-api, lkml

On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Andy Lutomirski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Safety of eBPF programs is statically determined by the verifier, which detects:
This is a very high-level review.  I haven't tried to read all the
code yet, and this is mostly questions rather than real comments.
These were great questions! I hope I answered them. If not, please
continue asking.
I have plenty more questions, but here's one right now: does anything
prevent programs from using pointers in comparisons, returning
pointers, or otherwise figuring out the value of a pointer?  If so, I
think it would be worthwhile to prevent that so that eBPF programs
can't learn kernel addresses.

--Andy
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help