Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 9 authors, 2014-09-26

Re: [PATCH 09/28] Remove ATHEROS_AR231X

From: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>
Date: 2014-06-18 11:10:24
Also in: linux-wireless, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Hi Paul,

2014-06-18 14:25 GMT+04:00 Paul Bolle [off-list ref]:
Jiri, Nick, Luis, John,

On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 13:20 +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
quoted
2014-04-15 21:08 GMT+04:00 Paul Bolle [off-list ref]:
quoted
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:14 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 02:50:30PM +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
quoted
John, can you delay the merging of this patch for a few months, I will
try to prepare the necessary patches to add AR231x architecture to the
kernel and send them to linux-mips.
OK -- looking forward to your patches.
So am I. Is there any news on this front?
Work still in progress :(
ATHEROS_AR231X and the things depending on it, like AHB bus support,
have been discussed for three years now. When will you (re)consider a
patch to remove all currently dead code?

And to state the obvious: AHB bus support, and the other code depending
on ATHEROS_AR231X, can always be re-added once ATHEROS_AR231X gets added
to the tree.
Work in progress, I don't stop it. Just work is progressing slower
than I had planned. I am already cleanup the code (mostly checkpatch
errors and warnings) and send patches to OpenWRT tree. Further I plan
to simplify initialization and I will be ready to send patches
upstream.

I need a couple of weeks for this. Is its reasonable time to not make
a mess of remove/add commits?

-- 
BR,
Sergey
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help