Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 6 authors, 2014-05-22

Re: [PATCH 1/13] libertas: make return of 0 explicit

From: Sergei Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-19 12:45:09
Also in: kernel-janitors, linux-wireless, lkml

Hello.

On 19-05-2014 8:31, Julia Lawall wrote:
From: Julia Lawall <redacted>
Delete unnecessary local variable whose value is always 0 and that hides
the fact that the result is always 0.
A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@r exists@
local idexpression ret;
expression e;
position p;
@@

-ret = 0;
... when != ret = e
return
- ret
+ 0
   ;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <redacted>
---
Alternatively, was an error code intended in the bad length case, as is
done in process_brxed_802_11_packet?
  drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c |    7 ++-----
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c
index c7366b0..807c5b8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -154,10 +152,9 @@ int lbs_process_rxed_packet(struct lbs_private *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
  	else
  		netif_rx_ni(skb);

-	ret = 0;
  done:
-	lbs_deb_leave_args(LBS_DEB_RX, "ret %d", ret);
-	return ret;
+	lbs_deb_leave_args(LBS_DEB_RX, "ret %d", 0);
    Why not just "ret 0"?
+	return 0;
WBR, Sergei
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help