Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 3 authors, 2014-05-17

Re: [PATCH] Fix for possible null pointer dereference in auth.c

From: Rickard Strandqvist <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-17 16:36:16
Also in: linux-nfs, lkml

Hi

I have made a new patch according Sergei specification.

But there remains Tronds question though.

Best regards
Rickard Strandqvist


2014-05-16 14:19 GMT+02:00 Sergei Shtylyov [off-list ref]:
Hello.


On 16-05-2014 1:56, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
quoted
There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
quoted
Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
[off-list ref]
---
  net/sunrpc/auth.c |   10 +++++++---
  1 fil ändrad, 7 tillägg(+), 3 borttagningar(-)
quoted
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth.c b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
index 5285ead..3a55698 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/auth.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
@@ -801,10 +801,14 @@ rpcauth_invalcred(struct rpc_task *task)
  {
        struct rpc_cred *cred = task->tk_rqstp->rq_cred;

-       dprintk("RPC: %5u invalidating %s cred %p\n",
-               task->tk_pid, cred->cr_auth->au_ops->au_name, cred);
-       if (cred)
+       if (cred) {
+               dprintk("RPC: %5u invalidating %s cred %p\n",
+                       task->tk_pid, cred->cr_auth->au_ops->au_name,
cred);
+
                clear_bit(RPCAUTH_CRED_UPTODATE, &cred->cr_flags);
+       }
+       else

   } and *else* should be on the same line, and there should be {} in the
*else* arm since there's {} in the *if* arm already, according to
Documentation/CodingStyle.

quoted
+               dprintk("RPC: %5u invalidating is NULL\n", task->tk_pid);

   That's not a proper English, I'm afraid.
quoted
  }

WBR, Sergei

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help