Re: [PATCH 2/3] cnic: Don't take cnic_dev_lock in cnic_alloc_uio_rings()
From: Benjamin Poirier <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-30 22:33:23
From: Benjamin Poirier <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-30 22:33:23
On 2014/05/30 16:18, Michael Chan wrote:
We are allocating memory with GFP_KERNEL under spinlock. Since this is the only call manipulating the cnic_udev_list and it is always under rtnl_lock, cnic_dev_lock can be safely removed.
In that case, the many other instances of cnic_dev_lock throughout cnic should also be removed, no?