Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: Provide empty definition of task_cgroup_path()
From: Vivek Goyal <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-12 20:13:35
Also in:
cgroups, lkml
From: Vivek Goyal <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-12 20:13:35
Also in:
cgroups, lkml
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 03:00:20PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
From: Vivek Goyal <redacted> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:45:41 -0400quoted
Compilation with !CONFIG_CGROUP fails for task_cgroup_path() user. So provide an emtpy definition. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <redacted> --- include/linux/cgroup.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h index 9450f02..bf40adb 100644 --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h@@ -869,6 +869,8 @@ static inline int cgroup_attach_task_all(struct task_struct *from, return 0; } +static inline int task_cgroup_path(struct task_struct *task, char *buf, size_t buflen) {return 0;} +Please properly format this just like any other function. static inline int task_cgroup_path(struct task_struct *task, char *buf, size_t buflen) { eturn 0; } It looked like a plain static declaration on first glance.
Sure I will. Also, looks like I have introduced a bug in second round of changes I made. I will fix that too and do a new posting. Thanks Vivek