Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2014-03-04

Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: Simplify by assuming the callers socket buffer is large enough

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2014-03-04 21:30:10
Also in: lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:50:19 -0800 ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
Modify audit_send_reply to directly use a non-blocking send and
to return an error on failure (if anyone cares).

Modify audit_list_rules_send to use audit_send_reply and give up
if we can not send a packet.

Merge audit_list_rules into iaudit_list_rules_send as the code
is now sufficiently simple to not justify to callers.

Kill audit_send_list, audit_send_reply_thread because using
a separate thread for replies is not needed when sending
packets syncrhonously.
Nothing much seems to be happening here?

In an earlier email you said "While reading through 3.14-rc1 I found a
pretty siginficant mishandling of network namespaces in the recent
audit changes." Were those recent audit changes a post-3.14 thing?  And
what is the user-visible effect of the mishandling?

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help