Re: For 3.14 [PATCH v3 net 1/3] xen-netback: remove pointless clause from if statement
From: Ian Campbell <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-31 10:33:13
On Sat, 2014-03-29 at 18:52 -0400, David Miller wrote:
From: Ian Campbell <redacted> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:58:47 +0000quoted
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 13:45 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:quoted
Friday, March 28, 2014, 12:39:05 PM, you wrote:quoted
This patch removes a test in start_new_rx_buffer() that checks whether a copy operation is less than MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET in length, since MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET is defined to be PAGE_SIZE and the only caller of start_new_rx_buffer() already limits copy operations to PAGE_SIZE or less.quoted
Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <redacted> Cc: Ian Campbell <redacted> Cc: Wei Liu <redacted> Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <redacted> --- drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c index 438d0c0..72314c7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c@@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ static bool start_new_rx_buffer(int offset, unsigned long size, int head) * into multiple copies tend to give large frags their * own buffers as before. */ - if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && - (size <= MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head) + BUG_ON(size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET); + if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head) return true; return false;For the whole v3 series: Reported-By: Sander Eikelenboom <redacted> Tested-By: Sander Eikelenboom <redacted> CC'ed Dave to get his attention since this is a last minute for 3.14.All three patches: Acked-by: Ian Campbell [off-list ref]Ok, we're coming down to the wire so this might not make it, but I'll queue it up for -stable and get it merged when I can.
Thanks!