Re: [PATCH net-next] ixgbevf: fix skb->pkt_type checks
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2014-02-28 23:31:57
2014-02-28 15:26 GMT-08:00 Brown, Aaron F [off-list ref]:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 14:58 -0800, Aaron Brown wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 14:44 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:quoted
skb->pkt_type is not a bitmask, but contains only value at a time from the range defined in include/uapi/linux/if_packet.h. Checking it like if it was a bitmask of values would also cause PACKET_OTHERHOST, PACKET_LOOPBACK and PACKET_FASTROUTE to be matched by this check since their lower 2 bits are also set, although that does not fix a real bug due to how the checks are used, it is still potentially confusing. This bogus check was introduced in commit 815cccbf ("ixgbe: add setlink, getlink support to ixgbe and ixgbevf"). Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Thanks Florian, I have added this to our internal queue.Unfortunately this introduces a compile error: ---------------------------------------------- /usr/src/kbuild_net-next_community/arch/x86/Makefile:133: CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled but no binutils support drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c: In function ‘ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq’: drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c:521: error: ‘adapter’ undeclared (first use in this function) drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c:521: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c:521: error: for each function it appears in.) make[5]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.o] Error 1 make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[4]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf] Error 2 make[3]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel] Error 2 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[2]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet] Error 2 make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2 make: *** [drivers] Error 2 ~ ---------------------------------------------- Are willing to fix up a v2?
Sure, let me re-submit with a fixed version (seems like I rebased against an earlier version). -- Florian