Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-30 23:29:12
Also in:
lkml
Sorry for replying so late... On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:38:47AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 29/01/2014 07:41, Sohny Thomas a écrit :quoted
Resending this on netdev mailing list: Default route for link local address is configured automatically if NETWORKING_IPV6=yes is in ifcfg-eth*. When the route table for the interface is flushed and a new address is added to the same device with out removing linklocal addr, default route for link local address has to added by default. I have found the issue to be caused by this checkin http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/net/ipv6?id=62b54dd91567686a1cb118f76a72d5f4764a86dd According to this change : He removes adding a link local route if any other address is added , applicable across all interfaces though there's mentioned only lo interface So below patch fixes for other devices Signed-off-by: Sohny THomas <redacted>Your email client has corrupted the patch, it cannot be applied. Please read Documentation/email-clients.txt About the patch, I still think that the flush is too agressive. Link local routes are marked as 'proto kernel', removing them without the link local address is wrong.
Actually I am not so sure, there is no defined semantic of flush. I would be ok with all three solutions: leave it as is, always add link-local address (it does not matter if we don't have a link-local address on that interface, as a global scoped one is just fine enough) or make flush not remove the link-local address (but this seems a bit too special cased for me). Greetings, Hannes