Re: [PATCH 19/21] wireless: slight optimization of addr compare
From: Ding Tianhong <hidden>
Date: 2013-12-23 14:26:03
Also in:
linux-wireless, lkml
于 2013/12/23 21:47, Felix Fietkau 写道:
On 2013-12-23 06:11, Ding Tianhong wrote:quoted
Use the recently added and possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp.It looks to me like all of these (including the ones in the other similar patches) are in places, where the address data is aligned to at least 16 bit. Because of this, using ether_addr_equal instead of ether_addr_equal_unaligned would be much better for platforms without CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. - Felix
Yes, the most of the place should use ether_addr_equal. thanks. Regards Ding
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html