Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] drivers: net: Put prototype declaration for function sbni_probe() in sbni.c
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Date: 2013-12-15 03:42:00
Also in:
lkml
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:26:58PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Rashika Kheria <redacted> Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:55:42 +0530quoted
This patch declares the prototype for the function sbni_probe() in file sbni.c. Thus, it also removes the following warning in wan/sbni.c: drivers/net/wan/sbni.c:224:12: warning: no previous prototype for ‘sbni_probe’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <redacted> --- This revision fixes the following issues of the previous revision: Incorrect fix drivers/net/wan/sbni.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/sbni.c b/drivers/net/wan/sbni.c index 388ddf6..5061ffd 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wan/sbni.c +++ b/drivers/net/wan/sbni.c@@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ static void __init sbni_devsetup(struct net_device *dev) dev->netdev_ops = &sbni_netdev_ops; } +int __init sbni_probe(int unit); int __init sbni_probe(int unit)This is not the correct way to fix this kind of warning, an exported function needs to appear in a header file so that both the definition and any callers of this function will see the same declaration in that header file.
It should, yes; however, in this case, the function is one of several dozen that are directly prototyped and used by drivers/net/Space.c, and there's no header file prototyping any of those functions. Do you have a suggestion for what header file should contain a prototype for this probe function? - Josh Triplett