Re: [PATCH] net: mac80211: tx.c: be sure of 'sdata->vif.type' must be NL80211_IFTYPE_AP when be in NL80211_IFTYPE_AP case
From: Chen Gang <hidden>
Date: 2013-12-04 08:39:27
Also in:
linux-wireless, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2013-12-04 · Re: [PATCH] net: mac80211: tx.c: be sure of 'sdata->vif.type' must be NL80211_IFTYPE_AP when be in NL80211_IFTYPE_AP case · Chen Gang <hidden>
- 2013-12-04 · Re: [PATCH] net: mac80211: tx.c: be sure of 'sdata->vif.type' must be NL80211_IFTYPE_AP when be in NL80211_IFTYPE_AP case · Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
- 2013-12-04 · Re: [PATCH] net: mac80211: tx.c: be sure of 'sdata->vif.type' must be NL80211_IFTYPE_AP when be in NL80211_IFTYPE_AP case · Chen Gang <hidden>
- 2013-12-02 · Re: [PATCH] net: mac80211: tx.c: be sure of 'sdata->vif.type' must be NL80211_IFTYPE_AP when be in NL80211_IFTYPE_AP case · Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
- 2013-12-02 · Re: [PATCH] net: mac80211: tx.c: be sure of 'sdata->vif.type' must be NL80211_IFTYPE_AP when be in NL80211_IFTYPE_AP case · Chen Gang <hidden>
On 12/04/2013 04:04 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 10:12 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:quoted
It is really not urgent, and for keeping quality, it is necessary to spend suitable time resource (e.g 1 hour or more) to make, review and test this kind of patch carefully by oneself. So could you please help improve it when you have suitable related time resources?No. Who are you to suggest what I need to work on? johannes
I am one of volunteers for Open Source, and I don't care about who I am. Since this thread is started by me, I have duty to try my best to let it finish (but may fail). According to our original discussion, it seems we agree that I am not the suitable member to finish it, so I suggest you or another members to try. Thanks. -- Chen Gang