Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 3 authors, 2013-12-02

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: ip6_pkt_prohibit(_out) should not depend on CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES

From: Kamala R <hidden>
Date: 2013-12-02 14:28:59
Also in: lkml

Hi,

I have submitted a version 4 of my patch that squashes the above
changes into it as well. Is that the right way to do it ?

Regards,
Kamala

On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:51:10PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <redacted>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:46:35 +0100
quoted
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 04:39:30PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <redacted>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 20:04:11 +0100
quoted
Since patch "IPv6: Fixed support for blackhole and prohibit routes" we
need ip6_pkt_prohibit(_out) available without CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES
defined.

Cc: Kamala R <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <redacted>
Please reference the SHA1 ID of the change as well as it's commit
header text, thank you.
This patch is a follow-up patch for the first one in this thread which is not
committed, yet. Either Kamala can squash them into one or I'll repost it
later.
I think they need to be combined, otherwise bisection is broken.
Kamala, as your patch is the main one, can you squash my patch into yours?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help