On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:51:22AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

In commit c9e9042994d3 ("ipv4: fix possible seqlock deadlock") I left
another places where IP_INC_STATS_BH() were improperly used.

udp_sendmsg(), ping_v4_sendmsg() and tcp_v4_connect() are called from
process context, not from softirq context.

This was detected by lockdep seqlock support.

Reported-by: jongman heo <redacted>
Fixes: 584bdf8cbdf6 ("[IPV4]: Fix "ipOutNoRoutes" counter error for TCP and UDP")
Fixes: c319b4d76b9e ("net: ipv4: add IPPROTO_ICMP socket kind")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <redacted>

Just got home after getting distracted with other things today and the work is
already done. Thanks, Eric! ;)

Exactly the spots I noticed this morning, so

Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <redacted>

Should we do something about the naming? I find it rather dangerous because
they look like the _bh lock postfixes but act exactly in the opposite?

Greetings,

  Hannes