RE: [PATCH] rds: Error on offset mismatch if not loopback
From: Venkat Venkatsubra <hidden>
Date: 2013-11-14 13:43:51
Also in:
lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Honggang LI [mailto:honli@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 6:56 PM To: Josh Hunt; Venkat Venkatsubra Cc: David Miller; jjolly@suse.com; LKML; netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] rds: Error on offset mismatch if not loopback On 11/14/2013 01:40 AM, Josh Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Venkat Venkatsubra [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Josh Hunt [mailto:joshhunt00@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:25 PM To: David Miller Cc: jjolly@suse.com; LKML; Venkat Venkatsubra; netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] rds: Error on offset mismatch if not loopback On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Josh Hunt [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:25 PM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: John Jolly <redacted> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:32:40 -0600quoted
Attempting an rds connection from the IP address of an IPoIB interface to itself causes a kernel panic due to a BUG_ON() being triggered. Making the test less strict allows rds-ping to work without crashing the machine. A local unprivileged user could use this flaw to crash the system. Signed-off-by: John Jolly <redacted>Besides the questions being asked of you by Venkat Venkatsubra, this patch has another issue. It has been completely corrupted by your email client, it has turned all TAB characters into spaces, making the patch useless. Please learn how to send a patch unmolested in the body of your email. Test it by emailing the patch to yourself, and verifying that you can in fact apply the patch you receive in that email. Then, and only then, should you consider making a new submission of this patch. Use Documentation/email-clients.txt for guidance. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/I think this issue was lost in the shuffle. It appears that redhat, ubuntu, and oracle are maintaining local patches to resolve this: https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=redpatch.git;a=commit;h=c7b6a0a1d8d636 85 2be130fa15fa8be10d4704e8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822754 http://ubuntu.5.x6.nabble.com/CVE-2012-2372-RDS-local-ping-DOS-td498 53 88.html Given that Oracle has applied it I'll make the assumption that Venkat's question was answered at some point. David - I can resubmit the patch with the proper signed-off-by and formatting if you are willing to apply it unless John wants to try again. I think it's time this got upstream. -- JoshUgh.. hopefully resending with all the html crap removed... -- Josh Hi Josh, No, I still didn't get an answer for how "off" could be non-zero in case of rds-ping to hit BUG_ON(off % RDS_FRAG_SIZE). Because, rds-ping uses zero byte messages to ping. If you have a test case that reproduces the kernel panic I can try it out and see how that can happen. The Oracle's internal code I checked doesn't have that patch applied. VenkatNo I don't have a test case. I came across this CVE while doing an audit and noticed it was patched in Ubuntu's kernel and other distros, but was not in the upstream kernel yet. Quick googling of lkml showed that there were at least two attempts to get this patch upstream, but both had issues due to not following the proper submission process: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/22/433 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/21/505 From my searching it appears the initial bug was found by someone at redhat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822754 I've added Li Honggang the reporter of this issue from Redhat to the mail. Hopefully he can share his testcase.
The test case is very simple:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install -y rds-tools
2. [root@rdma3 ~]# ifconfig ib0 | grep 'inet addr'
inet addr:172.31.0.3 Bcast:172.31.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
3. [root@rdma3 ~]# /usr/bin/rds-ping 172.31.0.3 <<<< kernel panic (You may need to wait for a few seconds before the kernel panic.)and possibly requires certain hardware as Jay writes in the first link above: "...some Infiniband HCAs(QLogic, possibly others) the machine will panic..."
This bug can be reproduced with Mellanox HCAs (mlx4_ib.ko and mthca.ko), QLogic HCA (ib_qib.ko). I did not test the QLogic HCA running "ib_ipath.ko". As I know the upstream code of RDS is broken. There are *many* RDS bugs. Best regards. Honggang
I was referring to this oracle commit: https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=redpatch.git;a=commit;h=c7b6a0a1d8d63685 2be130fa15fa8be10d4704e8 I have no experience with this code. There were a few comments around the reset and xmit fns about making sure the caller did certain things if not they were racy, but I have no idea if that's coming into play here.
Hi Honggang,
I ran rds-ping over local interface for 30 minutes. I stopped it after that.
It didn't hit any panic.
# ip addr show dev ib0
6: ib0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 2044 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1024
link/infiniband 80:00:00:48:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:21:28:00:01:cf:63:db brd 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.196.4.125/30 brd 10.196.4.127 scope global ib0
inet6 fe80::221:2800:1cf:63db/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
#
# rds-ping 10.196.4.125
1: 170 usec
2: 171 usec
....
....
....
1860: 173 usec
1861: 171 usec
1862: 177 usec
1863: 168 usec
1864: 171 usec
1865: 175 usec
^C#
I tested with Oracle UEK2 which is based on 2.6.39 kernel. Mellanox IB adaptor.
19:00.0 InfiniBand: Mellanox Technologies MT26428 [ConnectX VPI PCIe 2.0 5GT/s - IB QDR / 10GigE] (rev b0)
There is something about your setup that must be causing it for you.
Can I work with you offline if you are available ?
The panic you are hitting is not making sense to me.
Venkat