Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 4 authors, 2013-11-22

Re: [PATCH] bonding: If IP route look-up to send an ARP fails, mark in bonding structure as no ARP sent.

From: rama nichanamatlu <hidden>
Date: 2013-11-21 02:23:06

On 11/20/2013 5:18 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
rama nichanamatlu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
During the creation of VLAN's atop bonding the underlying interfaces are
made part of VLAN's, and at the same bonding driver gets aware that VLAN's
exists above it and hence would consult IP routing for every ARP to  be
sent to determine the route which tells bonding driver the correct VLAN
tag to attach to the outgoing ARP packet. But, during the VLAN creation
when vlan driver puts the underlying interface into default vlan and then
actual vlan, in-between this if bonding driver consults the IP for a
route, IP fails to provide a correct route and upon which bonding driver
drops the ARP packet. ARP monitor when it
comes around next time, sees no ARP response and fails-over to the next
available slave. Consulting for a IP route, ip_route_output(),happens in
bond_arp_send_all().

To prevent this false fail-over, when bonding driver fails to send an ARP
out it marks in its private structure, bonding{},  not to expect an ARP
response, when ARP monitor comes around next time ARP sending will be
tried again.

Extensively tested in a VM environment; sr-iov intf->bonding intf->vlan
intf. All virtual interfaces created at boot time.
	First, this patch appears to be for an older kernel, as the
current mainline code is substantially different (e.g., master_ip is no
longer used).

	Second, won't this methodology mask legitimate failures, such as
when a single arp_ip_target specifies a destination that is not ever
reachable?  I.e., would specifying a permanently unreachable IP address
as the arp_ip_target cause all slaves to always stay up (because no ARPs
will ever be sent), even if no ARP replies are ever received?

	-J
Thank U.
I agree with your rationale. Would keep a slave falsely up but traffic
might flow. And true that, it is not what we are looking for.
We can try a different approach too, which we used to fix a false
fail-over in MTU changing case where the device interface takes time to
change the device MTU. And in the mean time bonding was failing over.
What we did to fix was to stop the ARP monitoring, bond_change_mtu(),
and restart it when NETDEV_CHANGE from slave is handled,
bond_slave_netdev_event(). Not sure if this can used for vlan case, as
mtu thing is event driven.

quoted
Orabug: 17172660
Signed-off-by: Venkat Venkatsubra <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Rama Nichanamatlu <redacted>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help