Re: [PATCH] random: seed random_int_secret at least poorly at core_initcall time
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2013-11-15 18:33:04
Also in:
linux-wireless
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Theodore Ts'o [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 02:46:03PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:quoted
quoted
It is needed by fork to set up the stack canary. And this actually gets called before the secret is initialized.Maybe we could use this for the time being and use the seeding method of kaslr as soon as it hits the tree?Hmm, from what I can tell even early_initcall() is going to be early enough. The stack canary is set up by boot_init_stack_canary(), which is run very, very early in start_kerne() --- way before early_initcalls, or even before interrupts are enabled. So adding random_int_secret_init_early() as a core_initcall is still too late. I wonder if we need to do something in common with what Kees has been considering for the kaslr code, since it's a similar issue --- we need random number way earlier than we can really afford to initialize /dev/random.
Right now I've only been looking at x86. As things currently stand, we'll make use of RDRAND and RDTSC if they're available, and if neither are then go to the i8254 timer. Ingo wanted even more unpredictability, in the face of total failure from these more dynamic sources, so x86 also "seeds" itself with the build string and the boot_params. These last two are hardly high entropy, but they should at least make 2 different systems not have _identical_ entropy at the start. It's far from cryptographically secure, but it's something, I hope.
P.S. Unless I'm missing something (and I hope I am), it would appear that the stack canary is going to easily predictable by an attacker on non-x86 platforms that don't have RDRAND. Has someone tested whether or not the stack canary isn't constant across ARM or pre-Sandy Bridge x86 systems?
When the static stack canary was mentioned during the ARM summit, I dug around a little bit and saw that at very early boot, yes, it was always the same, but after boot finished, it was different from boot to boot. I didn't get far enough to figure out what was changing it later on. -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html