RE: [net-next 9/9] igb: Add ethtool support to configure number of channels
From: Wyborny, Carolyn <hidden>
Date: 2013-10-30 20:31:01
-----Original Message----- From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ben Hutchings Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 8:59 AM To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T Cc: davem@davemloft.net; Laura Mihaela Vasilescu; netdev@vger.kernel.org; gospo@redhat.com; sassmann@redhat.com Subject: Re: [net-next 9/9] igb: Add ethtool support to configure number of channels
[..]
In case this fails, is the interface in a consistent state where is it safe to reconfigure the interface again or to unbind the driver? If it fails, and the interface was up, shouldn't it call dev_close() so that it's obviously down and the user can then try to bring it up again? Ben.
Good question. I was delayed in replying as I was giving Laura a chance to reply to this thread. We call our close routine igb_close(), if the device is up. This does not call dev_close() specifically, however it’s a good suggestion for the error case. I'll update the patch. Thanks, Carolyn Carolyn Wyborny Linux Development Networking Division Intel Corporation