Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2013-09-30

Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq

flat view

From: Rusty Russell <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-30 01:51:14
Also in: lkml

Jason Wang [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue
mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and
loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure
their own transmission steering strategy.

So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when
the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support,
there's no need for keeping per-cpu vq_index and .ndo_select_queue(),
so they were removed also.

Cc: Rusty Russell <redacted>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c |   55 +++++++--------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index defec2b..4102c1b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -127,9 +127,6 @@ struct virtnet_info {
 	/* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */
 	bool affinity_hint_set;
 
-	/* Per-cpu variable to show the mapping from CPU to virtqueue */
-	int __percpu *vq_index;
-
 	/* CPU hot plug notifier */
 	struct notifier_block nb;
 };
@@ -1063,7 +1060,6 @@ static int virtnet_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *dev,
 static void virtnet_clean_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, long hcpu)
 {
 	int i;
-	int cpu;
 
 	if (vi->affinity_hint_set) {
 		for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
@@ -1073,20 +1069,11 @@ static void virtnet_clean_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, long hcpu)
 
 		vi->affinity_hint_set = false;
 	}
-
-	i = 0;
-	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
-		if (cpu == hcpu) {
-			*per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) = -1;
-		} else {
-			*per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) =
-				++i % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
-		}
-	}
 }
 
 static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 {
+	cpumask_var_t cpumask;
 	int i;
 	int cpu;
 
@@ -1100,15 +1087,21 @@ static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
+		return;
+
 	i = 0;
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, cpu);
 		virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, cpu);
-		*per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) = i;
+		cpumask_clear(cpumask);
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpumask);
+		netif_set_xps_queue(vi->dev, cpumask, i);
 		i++;
 	}
 
 	vi->affinity_hint_set = true;
+	free_cpumask_var(cpumask);
 }
Um, isn't this just cpumask_of(cpu)?

Cheers,
Rusty.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help