Hi Steffen,

On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:29:23 +0200 Steffen Klassert [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:59:19AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:25:05 +0200 Steffen Klassert [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:16:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

quoted

Today's linux-next merge of the ipsec-next tree got a conflict in
include/net/xfrm.h between commit d511337a1eda ("xfrm.h: Remove extern
from function prototypes") from the net-next tree and commit aba826958830
("{ipv4,xfrm}: Introduce xfrm_tunnel_notifier for xfrm tunnel mode
callback") from the ipsec-next tree.

Thanks for the information, I'll do a rebase of the ipsec-next
tree tomorrow.

Did you miss the end of the next paragraph:  "no action is required"?
Dave can fix this up (like I did) when he merges your tree into his.

I applied this patch shortly before the merge window opened, it is a left
over from the last develpoment cycle. I already rebased my tree onto
net-next in the past if that happened, even if there were no merge
conflicts. I did that just to see if everything still works. But I
could also do a test merge to see if everything still works and ask
to pull without a rebase then if this is the prefered way. Would make
my life easier :)

That would be up to Dave ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au