Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2013-09-30

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] bonding: use RCU protection for alb xmit path

From: Ding Tianhong <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-30 11:21:00

On 2013/9/30 18:52, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 07:45:05PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
quoted
The commit 278b20837511776dc9d5f6ee1c7fabd5479838bb
(bonding: initial RCU conversion) has convert the roundrobin,
active-backup, broadcast and xor xmit path to rcu protection,
the performance will be better for these mode, so this time,
convert xmit path for alb mode.

Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <redacted>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <redacted>
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <redacted>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h  |  2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index e960418..a1444d5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static struct slave *tlb_get_least_loaded_slave(struct bonding *bond)
    max_gap = LLONG_MIN;

    /* Find the slave with the largest gap */
-    bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
+    bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
        if (SLAVE_IS_OK(slave)) {
            long long gap = compute_gap(slave);
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static struct slave *rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
    struct list_head *iter;
    bool found = false;

-    bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
+    bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
        if (!SLAVE_IS_OK(slave))
            continue;
        if (!found) {
@@ -628,12 +628,14 @@ static struct slave *rlb_choose_channel(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bon
{
    struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
    struct arp_pkt *arp = arp_pkt(skb);
-    struct slave *assigned_slave;
+    struct slave *assigned_slave, *curr_active_slave;
    struct rlb_client_info *client_info;
    u32 hash_index = 0;

    _lock_rx_hashtbl(bond);

+    curr_active_slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+
    hash_index = _simple_hash((u8 *)&arp->ip_dst, sizeof(arp->ip_dst));
    client_info = &(bond_info->rx_hashtbl[hash_index]);
@@ -658,8 +660,8 @@ static struct slave *rlb_choose_channel(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bon
             * that the new client can be assigned to this entry.
             */
            if (bond->curr_active_slave &&
-                client_info->slave != bond->curr_active_slave) {
-                client_info->slave = bond->curr_active_slave;
+                client_info->slave != curr_active_slave) {
+                client_info->slave = curr_active_slave;
                rlb_update_client(client_info);
            }
        }
@@ -1343,11 +1345,6 @@ int bond_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *bond_dev)
    skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
    eth_data = eth_hdr(skb);

-    /* make sure that the curr_active_slave do not change during tx
-     */
-    read_lock(&bond->lock);
-    read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
    switch (ntohs(skb->protocol)) {
    case ETH_P_IP: {
        const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
@@ -1429,12 +1426,12 @@ int bond_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *bond_dev)

    if (!tx_slave) {
        /* unbalanced or unassigned, send through primary */
-        tx_slave = bond->curr_active_slave;
+        tx_slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
        bond_info->unbalanced_load += skb->len;
    }

    if (tx_slave && SLAVE_IS_OK(tx_slave)) {
-        if (tx_slave != bond->curr_active_slave) {
+        if (tx_slave != rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave)) {
            memcpy(eth_data->h_source,
                   tx_slave->dev->dev_addr,
                   ETH_ALEN);
@@ -1449,8 +1446,6 @@ int bond_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *bond_dev)
        }
    }

-    read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-    read_unlock(&bond->lock);
    if (res) {
        /* no suitable interface, frame not sent */
        kfree_skb(skb);
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
index 713b6af..1c7d559 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static inline struct slave *bond_slave_has_mac(struct bonding *bond,
    struct list_head *iter;
    struct slave *tmp;

-    bond_for_each_slave(bond, tmp, iter)
+    bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, tmp, iter)
This suggests that rcu_read_lock() is always held here, however it's not
the case, as far as I can tell:

bond_release()/bond_uninit() ->
__bond_release_one() ->
bond_alb_deinit_slave() ->
alb_change_hw_addr_on_detach() ->
bond_slave_has_mac()

There is nobody that takes rcu_read_lock() there. And, for example, when
doing:

echo -$slave > /sys/class/net/$bond_int/bonding/slaves

nobody is holding it. And, btw, in bond_for_each_slave_rcu(), which is
actually a wrapper for netdev_for_each_lower_private_rcu(), which calls
netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu(), which has:

4543 void *netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
4544                                         struct list_head **iter)
4545 {
4546         struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
4547 4548         WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());

so you should have seen that warning when trying to remove a slave in alb
mode.
quoted
        if (ether_addr_equal_64bits(mac, tmp->dev->dev_addr))
            return tmp;

-- 
1.8.2.1

oh, yes, has to do little more,thanks.
.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help