Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] bonding: use RCU protection for alb xmit path
From: Ding Tianhong <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-30 11:21:00
On 2013/9/30 18:52, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 07:45:05PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:quoted
The commit 278b20837511776dc9d5f6ee1c7fabd5479838bb (bonding: initial RCU conversion) has convert the roundrobin, active-backup, broadcast and xor xmit path to rcu protection, the performance will be better for these mode, so this time, convert xmit path for alb mode. Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <redacted> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <redacted> Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <redacted> Cc: Veaceslav Falico <redacted> --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 23 +++++++++-------------- drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c index e960418..a1444d5 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static struct slave *tlb_get_least_loaded_slave(struct bonding *bond) max_gap = LLONG_MIN; /* Find the slave with the largest gap */ - bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) { + bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) { if (SLAVE_IS_OK(slave)) { long long gap = compute_gap(slave);@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static struct slave *rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond) struct list_head *iter; bool found = false; - bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) { + bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) { if (!SLAVE_IS_OK(slave)) continue; if (!found) {@@ -628,12 +628,14 @@ static struct slave *rlb_choose_channel(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bon{ struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond)); struct arp_pkt *arp = arp_pkt(skb); - struct slave *assigned_slave; + struct slave *assigned_slave, *curr_active_slave; struct rlb_client_info *client_info; u32 hash_index = 0; _lock_rx_hashtbl(bond); + curr_active_slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave); + hash_index = _simple_hash((u8 *)&arp->ip_dst, sizeof(arp->ip_dst)); client_info = &(bond_info->rx_hashtbl[hash_index]);@@ -658,8 +660,8 @@ static struct slave *rlb_choose_channel(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bon * that the new client can be assigned to this entry. */ if (bond->curr_active_slave && - client_info->slave != bond->curr_active_slave) { - client_info->slave = bond->curr_active_slave; + client_info->slave != curr_active_slave) { + client_info->slave = curr_active_slave; rlb_update_client(client_info); } }@@ -1343,11 +1345,6 @@ int bond_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *bond_dev) skb_reset_mac_header(skb); eth_data = eth_hdr(skb); - /* make sure that the curr_active_slave do not change during tx - */ - read_lock(&bond->lock); - read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock); - switch (ntohs(skb->protocol)) { case ETH_P_IP: { const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);@@ -1429,12 +1426,12 @@ int bond_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *bond_dev) if (!tx_slave) { /* unbalanced or unassigned, send through primary */ - tx_slave = bond->curr_active_slave; + tx_slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave); bond_info->unbalanced_load += skb->len; } if (tx_slave && SLAVE_IS_OK(tx_slave)) { - if (tx_slave != bond->curr_active_slave) { + if (tx_slave != rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave)) { memcpy(eth_data->h_source, tx_slave->dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN);@@ -1449,8 +1446,6 @@ int bond_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *bond_dev) } } - read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock); - read_unlock(&bond->lock); if (res) { /* no suitable interface, frame not sent */ kfree_skb(skb);diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h index 713b6af..1c7d559 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static inline struct slave *bond_slave_has_mac(struct bonding *bond, struct list_head *iter; struct slave *tmp; - bond_for_each_slave(bond, tmp, iter) + bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, tmp, iter)This suggests that rcu_read_lock() is always held here, however it's not the case, as far as I can tell: bond_release()/bond_uninit() -> __bond_release_one() -> bond_alb_deinit_slave() -> alb_change_hw_addr_on_detach() -> bond_slave_has_mac() There is nobody that takes rcu_read_lock() there. And, for example, when doing: echo -$slave > /sys/class/net/$bond_int/bonding/slaves nobody is holding it. And, btw, in bond_for_each_slave_rcu(), which is actually a wrapper for netdev_for_each_lower_private_rcu(), which calls netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu(), which has: 4543 void *netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev, 4544 struct list_head **iter) 4545 { 4546 struct netdev_adjacent *lower; 4547 4548 WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held()); so you should have seen that warning when trying to remove a slave in alb mode.quoted
if (ether_addr_equal_64bits(mac, tmp->dev->dev_addr)) return tmp; -- 1.8.2.1
oh, yes, has to do little more,thanks.
.