Re: [patch] net/fec: "u32" is more explicit than "unsigned long" | netdev | Ratatoskr

[patch] net/fec: "u32" is more explicit than "unsigned long" · Dan Carpenter <hidden> · 2013-08-23
Re: [patch] net/fec: "u32" is more explicit than "unsigned long" · Ben Hutchings <hidden> · 2013-08-23
Re: [patch] net/fec: "u32" is more explicit than "unsigned long" · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2013-08-27
Re: [patch] net/fec: "u32" is more explicit than "unsigned long" · Dan Carpenter <hidden> · 2013-08-27
[patch v2] net/fec: cleanup types in fec_get_mac() · Dan Carpenter <hidden> · 2013-08-29
Re: [patch v2] net/fec: cleanup types in fec_get_mac() · Ben Hutchings <hidden> · 2013-08-29
RE: [patch v2] net/fec: cleanup types in fec_get_mac() · Duan Fugang-B38611 <hidden> · 2013-08-30
Re: [patch v2] net/fec: cleanup types in fec_get_mac() · Dan Carpenter <hidden> · 2013-08-30
Re: [patch v2] net/fec: cleanup types in fec_get_mac() · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2013-08-30

Re: [patch] net/fec: "u32" is more explicit than "unsigned long"

From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-27 18:59:10
Also in: kernel-janitors, linux-devicetree

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:51:44PM -0400, David Miller wrote:

Dan please resubmit with Ben's suggested changes, thanks.

Yes.  Of course.  Sorry for that, I'll resend tomorrow.

regards,
dan carpenter