Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/7] IPv6 MLD updates

[RFC PATCH net-next 0/7] IPv6 MLD updates · Daniel Borkmann <hidden> · 2013-08-30
[RFC PATCH net-next 2/7] net: ipv6: mld: clean up MLD_V1_SEEN macro · Daniel Borkmann <hidden> · 2013-08-30
[RFC PATCH net-next 1/7] net: ipv6: mld: fix v1/v2 switchback timeout to rfc3810, 9.12. · Daniel Borkmann <hidden> · 2013-08-30
[RFC PATCH net-next 3/7] net: ipv6: mld: get rid of MLDV2_MRC and simplify calculation · Daniel Borkmann <hidden> · 2013-08-30
[RFC PATCH net-next 4/7] net: ipv6: mld: implement RFC3810 MLDv2 mode only · Daniel Borkmann <hidden> · 2013-08-30
[RFC PATCH net-next 5/7] net: ipv6: mld: restrict min/max of sysctl force_mld_version · Daniel Borkmann <hidden> · 2013-08-30
[RFC PATCH net-next 6/7] net: ipv6: mld: similarly to MLDv2 have min max_delay of 1 · Daniel Borkmann <hidden> · 2013-08-30
[RFC PATCH net-next 7/7] net: ipv6: mld: document force_mld_version in ip-sysctl.txt · Daniel Borkmann <hidden> · 2013-08-30
Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/7] IPv6 MLD updates · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2013-08-30

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2013-08-30 18:38:49

From: Daniel Borkmann <redacted>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:58:21 +0200

If there are no further objections, I'll send out the non-RFC version on
Monday after some more testing. That's just a heads up. This set includes
my improved fix from yesterday as well besides other things.

Thanks!

From a coding style and general correctness perspective these changes

look fine to me.

I'll let IPV6 MLD experts comment on the semantic part.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help