Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2013-07-03

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: convert lls to use time_in_range()

From: Eliezer Tamir <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-02 20:28:08
Also in: lkml

On 02/07/2013 23:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 12:49 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
quoted
Time in range will fail safely if we move to a different cpu with an
extremely large clock skew.
Add time_in_range64() and convert lls to use it.

Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir <redacted>
---
v1->v2
fixed double call to sched_clock() in can_poll_ll(), checkpatchisms
quoted
+#define time_in_range64(a, b, c) \
+	(time_after_eq64(a, b) && \
+	 time_before_eq64(a, c))
[...]

Why not make this an inline function, so the caller doesn't need to
worry about repeated evaluation?
I was following the conventions in jiffies.h
(well almost, I did add a few spaces to make checkpatch happy)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help