On 07/01/2013 07:19 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Richard Weinberger [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

Am 01.07.2013 09:56, schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:

quoted

quoted

If we follow your reasoning, we can add dummy variants of all hardware support
that lives in arch/*/include/asm to asm-generic, so everything would compile
for all platforms. But that's now what we want.

I hope you meant *not* want?

Sorry, s/now/not/

I can understand your feelings, I also can understand if none of my
patches for 'asm-generic' will be applied.

Most of patches for 'asm-generic' should be for 'important' (e.g. duty
definition: whether should support 'COMPILE_TEST', what's the meaning of
'generic').

But this kind of patches are not 'emergent', they need be given more
considerations (they are not for applying, the are for thinking).

For duty definition, it is not for what we want to do, it is for what we
should do (or what we have to do).


At last, I will send related patches for 'COMPILE_TEST' (I can
understand if not applied, or no response). And also should send another
patch for HAS_IOMEM about ptp driver (also cc to you all).

Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang